Assessment of vegetation carrying capacity at the basin-scale using an improved SWAT modelстатья
Статья опубликована в высокорейтинговом журнале
Информация о цитировании статьи получена из
Scopus
Статья опубликована в журнале из списка Web of Science и/или Scopus
Дата последнего поиска статьи во внешних источниках: 23 января 2026 г.
Авторы:
Shantao An,
Wu Yiping,
Luo Xiankai,
He Ziqi,
Kivalov Sergey,
Alexandrov Georgii,
Dang Weiqin,
Yan Wende,
Wang Huanyuan,
Sivakumar Bellie,
Zhang Guangchuang,
Wang Qichen,
Zhao Fubo,
Qiu Linjing,
Sun Pengcheng,
Jin Zhao,
Chen Ji,
Liu Shuguang,
Han Yongming
Аннотация:Vegetation restoration represents a highly effective strategy for offsetting carbon emissions, mitigating climate change, and enhancing the quality of the eco-environment. Despite the ecological benefits, the large-scale ‘Grain-for-Green’ program in China has caused unintended hydrological consequences, threatening the sustainability of regional water resources in this arid and semi-arid region. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the competing water demands of ecosystems and humans. In this study, we investigated the effects of vegetation change on the water cycle and the vegetation carrying capacity in a semi-arid loess-gully basin using our previously modified Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), which focuses on simulating forest growth from young to mature stages. Model validation demonstrated that the improved SWAT model can well simulate eco-hydrological processes, including leaf area index (LAI), streamflow, evapotranspiration (ET), and soil water content. Simulations under various vegetation restoration scenarios revealed that low- and medium-intensity revegetation (converting sloping farmland (slope > 15°) to grass or forest) resulted in slight changes (≤4.84 %) in mean annual streamflow, soil water, and ET. In contrast, high-intensity revegetation caused significant water stress, with streamflow and soil moisture reduced by 19.35 % and 15.14 %, respectively. In addition, the vegetation carrying capacity of the watershed was evaluated, indicating that the basin can sustainably support a maximum LAI increase of 0.20 (15.63 %). Overall, this study can be valuable for vegetation restoration and forest management in the Chinese Loess Plateau, and the proposed methods can be applicable in other areas.